Review: 2014 Hugos: Novelettes, edited by Loncon 3

Publisher:	Loncon 3
Copyright:	2014
Format:	Kindle

This is another weird "book review" covering the Hugo-nominated novelettes for the 2014 Hugos (given for works published in 2014) at Loncon 3, the 2014 Worldcon. The "editor" is the pool of attendees and supporting members who chose to nominate works, all of which had been previously edited by other editors in their original publication. I received all of these as part of the Hugo voter's packet for being a supporting member, but they all appear to be available for free on the Internet (at least at the time of this writing). "The Exchange Officers" by Brad Torgersen: An okay, if not particularly ground-breaking, military SF story, ruined for me by the ham-handed introduction of superficial jingoism. The protagonists are doing a tour as remote operators of humanoid battle suits in orbit: not a new premise, but a servicable one. Since this is military SF, they predictably have to defend a space installation against attackers. So we get a bit of drama, a bit of zero-g combat, and the fun of people learning how to remotely operate suits. You've probably read this before, but it passes the time reasonably well. Unfortunately, Torgersen decided to make the villains the Chinese military for no adequately-explained reason. (Well, I'm being kind; I suspect the reason is the standard yellow peril nonsense, but that's less generous.) So there is snide commentary about how only the military understand the Chinese threat and a fair bit of old-fashioned jingoism mixed in to the story, to its detriment. If you like this sort of thing, it's a typical example, although it escapes me why people thought it was exceptional enough to warrant nomination. (5) "The Lady Astronaut of Mars" by Mary Robinette Kowal: Once again, my clear favorite among the stories also won, which is a lovely pattern. Elma was the female astronaut in an alternate history in which manned space exploration continued to grow, leading to permanent settlement on Mars. She spent lots of time being photographed, being the smiling face of the space program, while her husband worked on the math and engineering of the launches. Now, she's an old woman, taking care of her failing and frail husband, her career behind her. Or so she thinks, before an offer that forces an impossible choice between space and staying with her husband for his final days. This is indeed the tear-jerker that it sounds like, but it's not as maudlin as it might sound. Kowal does an excellent job with Elma's characterization: she's no-nonsense, old enough to be confident in her opinions, and knows how to navigate through the world. The story is mixed with nostalgia and memories, including a reminder of just what Elma meant to others. It touches on heroism, symbolism, and the horrible choices around dying loved ones, but I thought it did so deftly and with grace. I was expecting the story to be too obvious, but I found I enjoyed the quotidian feel. It's not a story to read if you want to be surprised, but I loved the small touches. (9) "Opera Vita Aeterna" by Vox Day: Before the review, a note that I consider obligatory. The author of this story is an aggressively misogynistic white supremacist, well-known online for referring to black people as savages and arguing women should not be allowed to vote. To what extent you choose to take that into account when judging his fiction is up to you, but I don't think it should go unsaid. "Opera Vita Aeterna" is the story of a monastery in a typical fantasy world (at least as far as one can tell from this story; readers of Vox Day's fantasy series will probably know more background). At the start of the story, it gets an unexpected visit from an elf. Not just any elf, either, but one of the most powerful magicians of his society. He comes to the monastery out of curiousity about the god that the monks worship and stays for a project of illuminating their scriptures, while having theological debates with the abbot. This story is certainly not the offensive tirade that you might expect from its author. Its biggest problem is that nothing of substance happens in the story, either theologically or via more conventional action. It's a lot of description, a lot of talking, a lot of warmed-over Christian apologetics that dodges most of the hard problems, and a lot of assertions that the elf finds something of interest in this monastery. I can believe this could be the case, but Vox Day doesn't really show why. There is, at the end of the story, some actual drama, but I found it disappointing and pointless. It leads nowhere. The theology has the same problem: elves supposedly have no souls, which is should be the heart of a theological question or conflict Vox Day is constructing, but that conflict dies without any resolution. We know nothing more about the theology of this world at the end of the story than we do at the beginning. Some of the descriptions here aren't bad, and the atmosphere seems to want to develop into a story. But that development never happens, leaving the whole work feeling fundamentally pointless. (4) "The Truth of Fact, the Truth of Feelng" by Ted Chiang: This is another oddly-constructed story, although I think a bit more successful. It's a story in two interwoven parts. One is a fictional essay, told in a non-fiction style, about a man living in a future world with ubiquitous life recording and very efficient search software. Any part of one's life can be easily found and reviewed. The other is the story of a boy from a tribal culture during European colonialism. He learns to read and write, and from that a respect for written records, which come into conflict with the stories that the tribe elders tell about the past. The purpose of both of these stories is to question both the value and the implications of recording everything in a way that preserves and guarantees the facts instead of individual interpretations. The boy's story calls this into question; the narrator's story offers ambiguous support for its value and a deeper plea for giving people space to change. I found the style a bit difficult to get used to, since much of it did not feel like a story. But it grew on me as I read it, and the questions Chiang raises have stuck with me since. The problem of how and when to allow for change in others when we have perfect (or at least vastly improved) memory is both important and complicated, and this is one of the better presentations of the problem that I've seen. It's more of a think-y piece, and closer to non-fiction than a story, but I thought it was worth reading. (8) "The Waiting Stars" by Aliette de Bodard: I keep wanting to like de Bodard's space opera world of AIs and living ships, but it never quite works for me. I've read several stories set in this universe now, and it has some neat ideas, but I always struggle with the characters. This story at least doesn't have quite as much gruesome pregnancy as the previous ones (although there's still some). "The Waiting Stars" opens with a raid on a ship graveyard, an attempt to rescue and "reboot" an AI starship under the guidance of another Mind. This is intermixed with another story about a woman who was apparently rescued in childhood from birthing ship Minds and raised in a sort of foster institution. This feels like a flashback at first, but its interaction with the rest of the story is something more complicated. The conceptual trick de Bodard pulls here is thought-provoking, but once again I struggled to care about all of the characters. I also found the ending discouraging and unsatisfying, which didn't help. Someone who isn't me might really like this story, but it wasn't my thing. (6) Rating: 6 out of 10

Zoe's Kindergarten encourages parents to come in and spend some time with the kids. I've heard reports of other parents coming in and doing baking with the kids or other activities at various times throughout the year. Zoe and I had both wanted me to come in for something, but it had taken me until the last few weeks of the year to get my act together and do something. I'd thought about coming in and doing some baking, but that seemed rather done to death already, and it's not like baking is really my thing, so I thought I'd do something technological. I just wracked my brains for something low effort and Kindergarten-age friendly. The Kindergarten has a couple of eduss touch screens. They're just some sort of large-screen with a bunch of inputs and outputs on them. I think the Kindergarten mostly uses them for showing DVDs and hooking up a laptop and possibly doing something interactive on them. As they had HDMI input, and my Raspberry Pi had HDMI output, it seemed like a no-brainer to do something using the Raspberry Pi. I also thought hooking up the MaKey MaKey to it would make for a more fun experience. I just needed to actually have it all do something, and that's where I hit a bit of a creative brick wall. I thought I'd just hack something together where based on different inputs on the MaKey MaKey, a picture would get displayed and a sound played. Nothing fancy at all. I really struggled to get a picture displayed full screen in a time efficient manner. My Pi was running Raspbian, so it was relatively simple to configure LightDM to auto-login and auto-start something. I used triggerhappy to invoke a shell script, which took care of playing a sound and an image. Playing a sound was easy. Displaying an image less so, especially if I wanted the image loaded fast. I really wanted to avoid having to execute an image viewer every time an input fired, because that would be just way too slow. I thought I'd found a suitable application in Geeqie, because it supported being out of band managed, but it's problem was it also responded to the inputs from the MaKey MaKey, so it became impossible to predictably display the right image with the right input. So the night before I was supposed to go to Kindergarten, I was up beating my head against it, and decided to scrap it and go back to the drawing board. I was looking around for a Kindergarten-friendly game that used just the arrow keys, and I remembered the trusty old Frozen Bubble. This ended up being absolutely perfect. It had enough flags to control automatic startup, so I could kick it straight into a dumbed-down full screen 1 player game (--fullscreen --solo --no-time-limit) The kids absolutely loved it. They were cycled through in groups of four and all took turns having a little play. I brought a couple of heads of broccoli, a zucchini and a potato with me. I started out using the two broccoli as left and right and the zucchini to fire, but as it turns out, not all the kids were as good with the "left" and "right" as Zoe, so I swapped one of the broccoli for a potato and that made things a bit less ambiguous. The responses from the kids were varied. Quite a few clearly had their minds blown and wanted to know how the broccoli was controlling something on the screen. Not all of them got the hang of the game play, but a lot did. Some picked it up after having a play and then watching other kids play and then came back for a more successful second attempt. Some weren't even sure what a zucchini was. Overall, it was a very successful activity, and I'm glad I switched to Frozen Bubble, because what I'd originally had wouldn't have held up to the way the kids were using it. There was a lot of long holding/touching of the vegetables, which would have fired hundreds of repeat events, and just totally overwhelmed triggerhappy. Quite a few kids wanted to pick up and hold the vegetables instead of just touch them to send an event. As it was, the Pi struggled to play Frozen Bubble enough as it was. The other lesson I learned pretty quickly was that an aluminium BBQ tray worked a lot better as the grounding point for the MaKey MaKey than having to tether an anti-static strap around each kid's ankle as they sat down in front of the screen. Once I switched to the tray, I could rotate kids through the activity much faster. I just wish I was a bit more creative, or there were more Kindergarten-friendly arrow-key driven Linux applications out there, but I was happy with what I managed to hack together with a fairly minimal amount of effort.

It s been more than 2 years since my last post about my smartphone. In the time after that post I upgraded my much loved Windows Phone 7 device to Windows Phone 8 (which I got rid of within months, for sucking), briefly used Firefox OS, then eventually used a Nexus 4 for at least a year. After years of terrible service provision and pricing, I decided I would not stay with my network Orange a moment longer and in getting a new contract, I would get a new phone too. So on Friday, I signed up to a new 15 per month contract with Three, including 200 minutes, unlimited data, and 25GB of data roaming in the USA and other countries (a saving of 200,000 per month versus Orange). Giffgaff is similarly competitive for data, but not roaming. No other network in the UK is competitive. For the phone, I had a shortlist of three: Apple iPhone 6, Sony Xperia Z3 Compact, and Samsung Galaxy Alpha. These are all small phones by 2014 standards, with a screen about the same size as the Nexus 4. I didn t consider any Windows Phone devices because they still haven t shipped a functional music player app on Windows Phone 8. Other more fringe OSes weren t considered, as I insist on trying out a real device in person before purchase, and no other comparable devices are testable on the high street. iPhone 6 This was the weakest offering, for me. 120 more than the Samsung, and almost 200 more than the Sony, a much lower hardware specification, physically larger, less attractive, and worst of all mandatory use of iTunes for Windows for music syncing. The only real selling point for me would be for access to iPhone apps. And, I guess, decreased chance of mockery by co-workers. Galaxy Alpha Now on to the real choices. I ve long felt that Samsung s phones are ugly plasticy tat the Galaxy S5 is popular, well-marketed, but looks and feels cheap compared to HTC s unibody aluminium One. They ve also committed the cardinal sin of gimping the specifications of their mini (normal-sized) phones, compared to the normal (gargantuan) versions. The newly released S5 Mini is about the same spec as early 2012 s S3, the S4 Mini was mostly an S2 internally, and so on. However, whilst HTC have continued along these lines, Samsung have finally released a proper phone under 5 , in the Alpha. The Alpha combines a 4.7 AMOLED screen, a plastic back, metal edges, 8-core big.LITTLE processor, and 2GB RAM. It is a PRETTY device the screen really dazzles (as is the nature of OLED). It feels like a mix of design cues from an iPhone and Samsung s own, keeping the angular feel of iPhone 4->5S rather than the curved edges on the iPhone 6. The Galaxy Alpha was one of the two devices I seriously considered. Xperia Z3 Compact The other Android device I considered was the Compact version of Sony s new Xperia Z3. Unlike other Android vendors, Sony decided that mini shouldn t mean low end when they released the Z1 compact earlier this year. The Z3 follows suit, where the same CPU and storage are found on both the big and little versions. The Z3C has a similar construction to the Nexus 4, with glass front and back, and plastic rim. The specification is similar to the Galaxy Alpha (with a quadcore 2.5GHz Qualcomm processor about 15% faster than the big.LITTLE Exynos in the Galaxy Alpha). It differs in a few places LCD rather than AMOLED (bad); a non-removable (bad) 2600 mAh battery (good) compared to the removable 1860 mAh in the Samsung; waterproofing (good); A less hateful Android shell (Xperia on Android vs Samsung Touchwiz). For those considering a Nexus-4-replacement class device (yes, rjek, that means you), both the Samsung and the Sony are worth a look. They both have good points and bad points. In the end, both need to be tested to form a proper opinion. But for me, the chunky battery and tasteful green were enough to swing it for the Sony. So let s see where I stand in a few months time. Every phone I ve owned, I ve ended up hating it for one reason or another. My usual measure for whether a phone is good or not is how long it takes me to hit the I can t use this limit. The Nokia N900 took me about 30 minutes, the Lumia 800 lasted months. How will the Z3 Compact do? Time will tell.

For weeks my Galaxy Tab 10.1 has reasonably consistently gone into safe mode. Not booting into it but I d use it fine then put it away and next time I looked at it, Safe Mode was there. It wasn t every time, but averaged to be about every second time. So the first thing was a bit of googling to see what this Safe Mode was. Most of the suggestions were around how to put it into safe mode during the boot process but my problem was opposite; it wasn t during booting and I wanted something to stop safe mode, not put the device into it. The closest I got to it was there was some misbehaving program that kicked the thing into safe mode. The problem was, I checked several times and there were no running programs. I really did start to worry I had a hardware fault or something wrong deep within the OS. When you have problems in IT, you re usually asked What s new? What s changed? . The answer is generally Nothing which gets a switch No really, what did change . The only answer I could come up with was a hardware keyboard. This slim aluminum uses bluetooth to communicate to the tablet and clips onto the front screen to protect it when not in use. Could this be the change I was looking for? The clue was that sometimes when you boot Android, if you hold down some keys it boots into safemode. It seems that holding down some combination of keys (volume up/down, power) puts into safe mode. The keyboard can clip onto the tablet in two ways, one long edge has some raised edges while one doesn t. If the raised edge was connected to the same side as the buttons, I d get safe mode sometimes as the edge pushed some of those buttons. More importantly, putting the raised edge on the side with no buttons meant no more safe mode. Not really a software or electrical fault, more one of just mechanics.

Five years ago, I opened The Eye of the World, the first book in the Wheel of Time series, and read:

Lord of the Morning, he said, I have come for you.

On the island, the air shimmered and coalesced. The black-clad man stood staring at the fiery mountain rising out of the plain. His face twisted in rage and contempt. You cannot escape so easily, Dragon. It is not done between us. It will not be done until the end of time. Then he was gone, and the mountain and the island stood alone. Waiting.

And then, as often, Robert Jordan began books citing some of the prophecy he invented:

And it came to pass in those days, as it had come before and would come again, that the Dark lay heavy on the land and weighed down the hearts of men, and the green things failed, and hope died. And men cried out to the Creator, saying, O Light of the Heavens, Light of the World, let the Promised One be born of the mountain, according to the prophecies, as he was in ages past and will be in ages to come. Let the Prince of the Morning sing to the land that green things will grow and the valleys give forth lambs. Let the arm of the Lord of the Dawn shelter us from the Dark, and the great sword of justice defend us. Let the Dragon ride again on the winds of time. from Charal Drianaan to Calamon,
The Cycle of the Dragon.
Author unknown, the Fourth Age

And then, the grand opening to each of the books in the 11,000-page series, something like this:

The Wheel of Time turns, and Ages come and pass, leaving memories that become legend. Legend fades to myth, and even myth is long forgotten when the Age that gave it birth comes again. In one Age, called the Third Age by some, an Age yet to come, an Age long past, a wind rose in the Mountains of Mist. The wind was not the beginning. There are neither beginnings nor endings to the turning of the Wheel of Time. But it was a beginning. Born below the ever cloud-capped peaks that gave the mountains their name, the wind blew east, out across the Sand Hills, once the shore of a great ocean, before the Breaking of the World. Down it flailed into the Two Rivers, into the tangled forest called the Westwood, and beat at two men walking with a cart and horse down the rock-strewn track called the Quarry Road.

And yesterday, 11,000 pages later, I have completed the series. Really, how could I have put down a book with such a majestic beginning as that? It hinted at the epic that was to come, the amazing literature I was going to read. I didn t read it straight through; I enjoyed books like War and Peace along the way. But what a trip the Wheel of Time series was. The characters were so detailed, so deep, the setting so elaborate, the plots so grand and also so small everyone from servants to queens were well-represented in the books. Not every section was a page-turner; in fact, around the 4th or 5th book, the series started to plod for a thousand pages or two, reading more like a history book than a novel. Sometimes the prejudices and stereotypes of the characters, particularly the sexism that both the men and women displayed, were frustrating to read. I never quite figured out of this was brilliant writing (making the reader feel frustrated at the plodding pace of the book when it was describing characters being frustrated at the plodding pace of events), or if it could have been trimmed down by 2/3 in some places. But really, the number of brilliant endings, laugh-out-loud situations, and page-turning suspense that somehow managed to build over hundreds, and then even thousands of pages, outweighed the flaws.

Politics is a foggy mire full of snakes. - The Eye of the World

Ah. Furlan washed his hands in one direction, then rubbed them in the other. Ah. Forgive me, Master Andra, but Lady Alys is a fierce sounding woman. Only with those who displease her, Lan said blandly. Her bite is far worse than her bark. Ah. Ah. Ah. Your rooms are this way. . . - The Dragon Reborn

One of the marks of truly good writing is that I leave a book or series with a sense of sadness or nostalgia, leaving characters that seem almost like friends. I felt that after finishing the last book in the series, A Memory of Light. The ending was deep, and satisfying, but ultimately left me wanting even more even more than 11,000 pages, somehow.

Elienda and Briain woke from the dream. She might have been speaking of the weather rather than two deaths among women she knew. We all must wake eventually. - Knife of Dreams

I was often touched by the way the Aiel referred to each other. A desert people, their fond farewall was may you always find water and shade. A fitting metaphor for anyone s life, I think. And they referred to their spouse as shade of my heart. Jordan touched on quite a few themes of religion and philosophy. In that quote above, he has the Aiel referring to death as waking from a dream. An intriguing metaphor, isn t it? He even writes conflicts of philosophy, religion, and culture into the series. I was particularly impressed with his treatment of theodicy and the problem of evil (the argument and religious response relating to the presence of evil in the world in the face of a loving God.) It is the most impressive treatment I have seen in fiction, and does a better job of advancing the theodistic argument than many philosophers have, I suspect. It is hard to really go into that one here because of the length and potential for spoilers. I can, however, comment on his treatment of existential nihilism the theory that life and the universe is without meaning, and the sometimes-related comment that what does anything matter then anyway? Here are a couple of quotes:

In Maradon, I saw what had been done to men who followed me. I saw Light in them, Min. Defying the Dark One no matter the length of his shadow. We will live, that defiance said. We will love and we will hope. And I saw him trying so hard to destroy that. He knows that if he could break them, it would mean something. Something much more than Maradon. Breaking the spirit of men he thirsts for that. He struck far harder than he otherwise would have because he wanted to break my spirit. His voice grew softer and he opened his eyes, looking down at her. And so I stood against him. - Towers of Midnight

What if I think it s all meaningless? he demanded with the loud voice of a king. What if I don t want it to keep turning? We live our lives by the blood of others! And those others become forgotten. What good is it if everything we know will fade? Great deeds or great tragedies, neither means anything! They will become legends, then those legends will be forgotten, then it will all start over again!

Why? Rand thought with wonder. Because each time we live, we get to love again.

It felt relaxing to stare out at that distant light, so welcoming and noble. Storms will soon come, it seemed to say. But for now, I am here. I am here. - The Gathering Storm

I unfortunately can t put in in its proper context due to spoilers, but it is a pivotal turning point in the series, relating to the preservation of the world. By giving what we might normally call a characteristic or behavior evil an almost-human voice and character, it can be discussed in interesting ways.

We are always more afraid than we wish to be, but we can always be braver than we expect. Hold on to your heart, and the Aes Sedai cannot harm what is really you, your heart. They are not nearly so far above us as we believed. May you always find water and shade, Egwene. And always remember your heart. - Lord of Chaos

Eben is dead. Would you want to forget your pain if you lost that hulking giant of yours? Have your feelings for him cut away like some spoiled chunk of flesh in an otherwise good roast? - The Gathering Storm

These quotes are examples of characters in the series dealing with difficult situations. In one, a character is yelled at for offering to use her special powers to numb the pain of another person over a death. It brings up a question that those of us that have known pain might find interesting: would we really have wanted our pain erased? And suggests perhaps not. That there is a benefit to it. That we get through it by embracing it by embracing it while still being true to our heart.

He had four rules concerning action and information. Never make a plan without knowing as much as you can of the enemy. Never be afraid to change your plans when you receive new information. Never believe you know everything. And never wait to know everything. - Lord of Chaos

Sometimes the series treats us to logical thinkers, whether they are generals or innkeepers, and gives us little tidbits like this one.

Androl brushed off his hands, smiling. Children were so adaptable. Before them, centuries of tradition, terror and superstition could melt away like butter left too long in the sun. - Towers of Midnight

And sometimes, things to chew over. Isn t that an interesting comment on prejudice? Children aren t born prejudiced; we can see how easily they make friends with anyone. It is sad that we teach them to be, isn t it? Wheel of Time is a fine story, expertly woven. But it is not just a story. It is true, in the sense that it illuminates truths, just like Romeo and Juliet can. In it, I see lessons and echoes of the civil rights era, comments on what makes good leaders, characters wrestling with decisions without adequate data, people putting on a mask of emotions, sacrifice, and the overall theme of the entire series: the power of love and compassion. The inspiration of the series for me well, it is there, but it may take a few more days to figure it out. I think it has something to do with this: The wind rose high and free, to soar in an open sky with no clouds.

"Take, for example, the opening to Eleanor Catton's The Luminaries: 'The twelve men congragated in the smoking room of the Crown Hotel gave the impression of a party accidentally met.' This is emphatically not the same as starting a novel with 'So there they were: a dozen men in the Crown Hotel, all together in the smoking-lounge, looking like they'd only met there by chance.' Yes, the explicit narrative data conveyed in the two are the same, but just as you wouldn't be happy with your publisher simply producing a sort of casual paraphrase of your writing and publishing that under your name, so your foreign-language publishers are hiring people to write exactly the same book as the one you've written. (Except for all the words, obviously.) Sound difficult? The reality is harder still. Every language is different. There's no single word in one language that maps perfectly onto a word in another - not one. And every language has things it can do, and things it can't."

[...]

"Once the contract is signed, the translator takes a deep breath and dives in. Their job is two-fold, and simple: they read you, then they write you.
They read you with more care than anybody else will, more demandigly, more inquiringly. Yes, your editor might take a moment to consider your punctuation if it doesn't work and needs rethinking, but translators have to think hard about it even - or especially - if it does."

A beautiful piece on translators: "The curious condition of being a translator" by Daniel Hahn via Paula G es on GV-Authors mailing list.

This week's project is a quick t-shirt reconstruction with the reverse appliqu technique which basically means layering two different fabrics, sew them togheter, and then cut away part of the top one to reveal the one underneath.
Ready to start? What you will need

• a plain t-shirt in your size
• some fabric for the patch
• fusible interfacing
• fabric shears
• small and sharp scissors
• pins
• needle and thread (or, if you prefer, a sewing machine)
• pencil

A guitar, Infinite Jest, The Illuminatus Trilogy and The Year of the Flood, while suggested for your personal enjoyment, are not strictly necessary for this project. Step 1 Cut a square of red fabric of the desired dimensions, I've used the short sleeve of a ruined red t-shirt.
On the wrong side of your patch, apply the fusible interfacing. Step 2 Draw a swirl on the interfacing.
IMPORTANT: remember to draw the swirl as mirrored, because the interfacing is the wrong side of our patch.
So, if usually the Debian swirl has the back to the left and the front to the right - like a "(" - when you draw it on the interfacing it will need to have the back to the right and front to the side - like a ")".
I do realize that this explanation isn't really clear: just look at the picture above. Step 3 Turn your t-shirt inside out and pin the patch (with the interfacing up) in the place you want to put it: I decided to put mine on the lower left corner, approximately 10 cm above the bottom hem.
(In the picture is lower, I changed idea on the position just before sewing it)
Now you can sew it, following closely the drawn line.
Because I'm lazy, I decided to do it by hand, but if you're not afraid of sewing curved shapes, doing it with the sewing machine is definitely the right (and quick) way to do it. Step 4 Now, you can cut the extra fabric around your swirl. Step 5 Turn your shirt right side out.
Make a snip through the knit in the fabric on the inside part of your stitches and cut off the extra fabric, to reveal the red swirl underneath.
Be careful to not cut the red fabric! Step 6 If you like it, you can end embroidering a dashed line (with running stitches) in a contrasting thread all around the swirl. And you're finished: now you can enjoy your new Debian t-shirt! :) For any questions feel free to contact me.

Review: Get Everything Done, by Mark Forster

Publisher:	Hodder & Stoughton
Copyright:	2000
ISBN:	0-340-74620-3
Format:	Trade paperback
Pages:	190

Mark Forster is the author of my (current) favorite time management book, Do It Tomorrow, and several excellent blog posts. I've therefore been rather curious about some of his earlier books, and finally decided to order this one. It appears to only have been published in the UK, so it can be a bit expensive in the US unless you can find it used. The main reason why I like Forster's writing so much is that he's a theory and neat trick sort of author instead of a single system author. A lot of time management writing (such as Getting Things Done) presents a single system that's supposedly universal. If that system happens to work for you, great. If it doesn't, the usefulness of the book drops off rapidly. You have to work through the basic principles, which are often sidelined in the book, and come up with variations on your own. Forster is the other sort of time management author: he throws out a flurry of tricks and tactics and lets you see which ones stick. He doesn't have a single system; indeed, one of the most entertaining parts of Get Everything Done is a parable about following many of the common time management systems and having one's life get worse and worse. Instead, he talks about the underlying theory, about the different approaches he's tried and their tradeoffs, and about lots of little tricks that he's found help in one situation or another. It's more of a toolkit than a system. This is, of course, only as good as the clarity of presentation. In both Do It Tomorrow and here, the clarity is excellent. For example, one of the most eye-opening ideas he explores in this book is that time management is a horrible name for the field. Time continues on no matter what you do; you can't increase it, and you can't save it. Rather, what you're actually doing is attention management: for each moment, you're deciding where to direct your attention. Things to which you turn your attention will change; things that you don't pay attention to will not change (except possibly for the worse). I'm quite fond of this reframing of the problem. Forster's thinking about time, or, rather, attention management is not as fully-developed here as in the later Do It Tomorrow. Much of the latter book is about the theory and practice of to-do lists. The techniques presented here were, at least for me, less immediately inspiring, although still thought-provoking. Much of the book focuses on internal resistance and procrastination, on the concept of self-control and decision-making as a mental "muscle" that has to be exercised, and on a philosophy of attention management that slowly builds up to doing whatever one is resisting the most at the moment. I haven't had a chance to work through the exercises that he offers (Forster's books tend to be full of illuminating exercises), so I don't have a fully-formed opinion on their efficacy. I was able to put Do It Tomorrow into practice more immediately. However, one thing this book does do is tackle directly the problem of trying to do too many things. Since this, more than organization, is the heart of my personal attention management problems, I was delighted to see this. Most attention management books at least give lip service to the problem, but they provide little useful guidance. David Allen's Getting Things Done effectively rules it out of scope: the goal of the system is to free you to act on your decisions, but there's little or no attention paid to the practical problem of making those decisions. As a result, I had serious trouble with GTD when I tried to use it. My project and next action lists would simply grow without bound, and GTD offered no useful assistance with culling them. Deciding what to do is, of course, a hard problem, but Forster here offers some specific and useful techniques and spends some time on the necessity of culling one's backlog. He also states directly the problem that everyone else seems to dance around: if you don't cull your committments, no attention management system will actually help you. It will just enable you to do trivia more efficiently, and therefore allow you to fill your life with even more of it, while still feeling just as overwhelmed as before. The bluntness is refreshing, and the exercises in cataloging commitments with time values and then forcing yourself to reduce the commitment list to the doable look quite helpful. I would still start with Do It Tomorrow rather than this book, since I think some practical approaches to to-do list management are one of the best places to start with attention management. But I'm glad I picked up this book as well, despite the cost of the UK import, and I plan on working through the exercises in it. Unlike David Allen, who has one basic system and whose other book was interesting but not as helpful, Forster's toolkit approach means that more books mean more ideas and more possible tools. He doesn't stick with one concept and polish it; he tries a lot of different ideas and then analyzes their strengths and weaknesses. If Do It Tomorrow spoke to you, I recommend grabbing this one as well. (Yes, it's somewhat amusing for me to read and review this book immediately after The Making of the Indebted Man, since to an extent attention management is part of the remaking of the self that's the obligation of the debtor in Lazzarato's construction of the nature of debt. It was something that occurred to me while reading this book. But I think Forster does a good job of showing attention management as a tool to direct one's efforts towards an internal goal rather than externally-imposed goals.) Rating: 8 out of 10

Collabora recently had a problem with a project's ARM build farm. In a nice change of pace it was not that the kernel was crashing, nor indeed any of the software or hardware.
The ProblemInstead our problem was our build farm could best be described as "a pile of stuff" and we wanted to add more systems to it and have switched power control for automated testing.

Which is kinda where the Christopher Alexander quote comes into this. I suggested that I might be able to come up with a better, or at least cleaner, solution.
The IdeaPrevious experience had exposed me to the idea of using 19 inch subracks for mounting circuits inside submodules.

I originally envisaged the dev boards individually mounted inside these boxes. However preliminary investigation revealed that the enclosures were both expensive and used a lot of space which would greatly increase the rack space required to house these systems.

I decided to instead look at eurocard type subracks with carriers for the systems. Using my 3D printer I came up with a carrier design for the imx53 QSB and printed it. I used the basic eurocard size of 100mm x 160mm which would allow the cards to be used within a 3U subrack.

Once assembled it became apparent that each carrier would be able to share resources like power supply, ethernet port and serial console via USB just as the existing setup did and that these would need to be housed within the subrack.
The PrototypeThe carrier prototype was enough to get enough interest to allow me to move on to the next phase of the project. I purchased a Schroff 24563-194 subrack kit and three packs of guide rails from Farnell and assembled it.

Initially I had envisaged acquiring additional horizontal rails from Schroff which would enable constructing an area suitable for mounting the shared components behind the card area.

Unfortunately Schroff have no suitable horizontal profiles in their catalog and are another of those companies who seem to not want to actually sell products to end users but rather deal with wholesalers who do not have their entire product range!

Undaunted by this I created my own horizontal rail profile and 3D printed some lengths. The profile is designed to allow a 3mm thick rear cover sheet attached with M2.5 mounting bolts and fit rack sides in the same way the other profiles do.

At this point I should introduce some information on how these subracks are dimensioned. A standard 19 inch rack (as defined in IEC 60297) has a width of 17.75 inches(450.85mm) between the vertical posts. The height is measured in U (1.75 inches)

A subrack must obviously fit in the horizontal gap while providing as much internal space as possible. A subrack is generally either 3 or 6 U high. The width within a subrack is defined in units called HP (Horizontal Pitch) which are 0.2 inches(5.08 mm) and subracks like the Schroff generally list 84 usable HP.

However we must be careful (or actually just learn from me stuffing this up ;-) as the usable HP is not the same thing as the actual length of the horizontal rails! The enclosures actually leave and additional 0.1 inch at either end giving a total internal width of 85HP (17 inches, 431.8 mm) which leaves 0.75 inches for the subrack sides and some clearance.

The Schroff subrack allows eurocards to be slotted into rails where the card centre line is on HP boundaries, hence we describe the width of a card in the slot in terms of HP
I cannot manufacture aluminium extrusions (I know it is a personal failing) nor produce more than 100 mm long length of the plastic profile on my printer.

Even if full lengths are purchased from a commercial service (120 euros for a pair including tax and shipping) the plastic does not have sufficient mechanical strength.

The solution I came up with was somewhat innovative, as an alternative a M5 bolt into a thread in the aluminium extrusion I used a 444mm long length of 4mm threaded rod with nuts at either end. This arrangement puts the extrusion under compression and gives it a great deal of additional mechanical strength as the steel threaded rod is very strong.

Additionally to avoid having to print enough extrusion for the entire length I used some 6mm aluminium tube as a spacer between 6HP(30.48mm) wide sections of the printed extrusion.

It was intended to use a standard modular PC power supply which is 150mm wide which is pretty close to 30HP (6 inches) so it was decided to have a 6HP section of rail at that point to allow a rear mounting plate for the PSU to be attached.

This gives 6HP of profile, 21HP(106.68mm) of tube spacer, 6HP of profile, 46HP(233.68 mm) of tube spacer and a final 6HP profile summing to our total of 85HP. Of course this would be unnecessary if a full continuous 85HP rail had been purchased, but 6 of 6 HP long profile is only 51 euro a saving of 70 euro.

To provide a flat area on which to mount the power switching, Ethernet switch and USB hubs I ordered a 170 x 431 mm sheet of 3mm thick aluminium from inspiredsteel who, while being an ebay company, were fast, cheap and the cutting was accurate.

Do be sure to mention you would prefer it if any error made the sheet smaller rather than larger or it might not fit, for me though they were accurate to the tenth of a mm! If you would prefer the rear section of the rack to be enclosed when you are finished, buy a second sheet for the top. For my prototype I only purchased a 170 x 280mm sheet as I was unsure if I wanted a surface under the PSU (you do, buy the longer sheet)

Mounting the PSU was a simple case of constructing a 3 mm thick plate with the correct cutouts and mounting holes for an ATX supply. Although the images show the PSU mounted on the left hand side of the rack this was later reversed to improve cable management.

The subrack needed to provide Ethernet switch ports to all the systems. A TP-Link TL-SF1016DS 16-Port 10/100Mbps Switch was acquired and the switch board removed from its enclosure. The switch selected has an easily removed board and is powered by a single 3.3V input which is readily available from the ATX PSU.

Attention now returned to the eurocard carriers for the systems, the boards to be housed were iMX53 QSB and iMX6 SABRE Lite and a Raspberry Pi control system to act as USB serial console etc.

The carriers for both main boards needed to be 8HP wide, comprised of:

• Combined USB and Ethernet Jack on both boards was 30 mm tall
• PCB width of 2mm
• underside components of 4mm
• clearance between boards of 2mm

A wiring loom was constructed for each board giving them a connector tail long enough to allow them to be removed. This was the wrong approach! if you implement this design (or when I do it again) the connector tails on the wiring loom should present all the connections to the rear at the same depth as the Ethernet connection.

The rack cables themselves should be long enough to allow the slides to be removed but importantly it is not desirable to have the trailing cable on the cards. I guess the original eurocard designers figured this out as they designed the cards around the standard fixed DIN connectors at the back of the card slots.

We will now briefly examine a misjudgement that caused the initially deployed solution to be reimplemented. As the design was going to use USB serial converters to access the serial console a USB connected relay board was selected to switch the power to each slot. I had previously used serial controlled relay boards with a USB serial convertor however these were no longer available.

All the available USB relay boards were HID controlled, this did not initially seem to be an issue and Linux software was written to provide a reasonable interface. However it soon became apparent that the firmware on the purchased board was very buggy and crashed the host computer's USB stack multiple times.

Deployed solutionOnce it became apparent that the USB controlled power board was not viable a new design was conceived. As the Ethernet switch had ports available Ethernet controlled relay boards were acquired.

It did prove necessary to design and print some PCB support posts with M3 nut traps to allow the relay boards to be easily mounted using double sided adhesive pads.

By stacking the relay boards face to face and the Ethernet switch on top separated using nylon spacers it was possible to reduce the cable clutter and provide adequate cable routing space.

A busbar for Ground (black) and unswitched 12V (yellow) was constructed from two lengths of 5A chock block.

An issue with power supply stability was noted so a load resistor was added to the 12V supply and an adhesive thermal pad used to attach it to the aluminium base plate.

It was most fortunate that the ethernet switch mounting holes lined up very well with the relay board mounting holes allowing for a neat stack.

This second edition is the one currently in use, it has proved reliable in operation and has been successfully updated with additional carriers.

The outstanding issues are mainly centered around the Raspberry Pi control board:

• Needs its carrier fitting. It is currently just stuck to the subrack end plate.
• Needs its Ethernet cable replacing. The existing one has developed a fault post installation.
• Needs the USB hub supply separating from the device cable. The current arrangement lets the hub power the Pi which means you cannot power cycle it.
• Connect its switched supply separately to the USB hub/devices.

Shopping listThe final bill of materials (excluding labour and workshop costs) which might be useful to anyone hoping to build their own version.

Prices are in GBP currency converted where appropriate and include tax at 20% and delivery to Cambridge UK and were correct as of April 2013.

The purchasing was not optimised and for example around 20GBP could be saved just by ordering all the shapeways parts in one order.

Base subrack
Item	Supplier	Quantity	Line Price
Schroff 24563-194 subrack kit	Farnell	1	41.28
Schroff 24560-351 guide rails	Farnell	3	13.65
Schroff rack rear horizontal rail	Shapeways	2	100.00
1000mm length of 4mm threaded rod	B and Q	1	1.48
170mm x 431mm x 3mm Aluminium sheet	inspired steel	2	40.00
PSU mounting plate	Shapeways	1	35.42
PCB standoff	Shapeways	4	22.30
160mm Deep Modular PC supply	CCL	1	55.76
TP-Link TL-SF1016DS 16-Port 10/100Mbps-Switch	CCL	1	23.77
8 Channel 16A Relay Board Controlled Via Ethernet	Rapid	2	126.00
Raspberry Pi	Farnell	1	26.48
USB Serial converters	CCL	10	37.40
10 port strip style USB HUB	Ebay	1	7.00
Parts for custom Ethernet cables	RS	13	26.00
Parts for custom molex power cables (salvaged from scrap ATX PSU)	Workshop	11	11.00
33R 10W wirewound resistor for dummy load	RS	1	1.26
24pin ATX female connector pre-wired	Maplin	1	2.99
Akasa double sided thermal pad	Maplin	1	5.00
Small cable tie bases	Maplin	1	6.49
Miscellaneous cable, connectors, nylon standoffs, solder, heatshrink, zip ties, nuts, washers etc.	Workshop	1	20.00
Total for subrack			603.28

The carriers are similarly not optimally priced as over five GBP each can be saved by combining shipping on orders alone. Also the SSD drive selection was made some time ago and a newer model may be more suitable.

i.MX53 QSB carrier
Item	Supplier	Quantity	Line Price
i.MX53 QSB	Farnell	1	105.52
Intel 320 SSD 80G	CCL	1	111.83
Carrier board	Shapeways	1	30.00
combined sata data and power (15 to 20cm version)	EBay	1	5.00
Low profile right angle 5.5mm x 2.1mm barrel jack	EBay	1	0.25
Parts for 9pin serial cable extension	RS	1	5.00
Miscellaneous solder, heatshrink, nylon nuts, bolts and washers	Workshop	1	5.00
Total for carrier			262.60

i.MX6 SABRE Lite carrier
Item	Supplier	Quantity	Line Price
i.MX6 SABRE Lite	Farnell	1	128.06
Intel 320 SSD 80G	CCL	1	111.83
Carrier board	Shapeways	1	35.00
combined sata data and power (15 to 20cm version)	EBay	1	5.00
Low profile right angle 5.5mm x 2.1mm barrel jack	EBay	1	0.25
Parts for 9pin serial cable modification	RS	1	2.00
Miscellaneous solder, heatshrink, nylon nuts, bolts and washers	Workshop	1	5.00
Total for carrier			287.14

ConclusionThe solution works and in a 3U high 355mm deep subrack ten ARM development boards can be racked complete with local ethernet switching, power control and serial consoles.

The solution is neat and provides flexibility, density and reproducibility the "pile of stuff" solution failed to do.

For current prototype with nine filled slots the total cost was around 3000GBP or around 330GBP per slot which indicates a 100GBP per slot overhead over the "pile of stuff" solution. These figures omit the costs of the engineer and workshop time, which are estimated at an additional 1500GBP. Therefore a completed rack, fully filled with i.MX6 carriers costs around 5000GBP

Density could be increased if boards with lower height requirements were used however above twelve units there issues with Ethernet switch, power switch and USB port availability become a factor. For Example the 16 port Ethernet switch requires a port for uplink, one for each relay board and one for the console server which leaves only 12 ports for systems.

Addressing the outstanding issues would result in a much more user friendly solution. As the existing unit is in full time use and downtime is not easily scheduled for all ten systems, the issues are not likely to be fixed on the prototype and would have to be solved on a new build.

The solution is probably not suitable for turning into a product but that was not really the original aim. A commercial ARM blade server using this format would almost certainly use standard DIN connectors and a custom PCB design rather than adapting existing boards.

Micka l Delahaye has a plugin for Gedit 2 to force off spaces-instead-of-tabs for Makefiles. I wrote a similar plugin for Gedit 3, since all the APIs have changed. The source is at git://git.gitano.org.uk/personal/liw/makefiletab3 (no .deb as of this time). I probably did something really stupid in the plugin code, since I have no idea how plugins should really be written: I wasn't very illuminated by the documentation.

Review: Fantasy & Science Fiction, March/April 2011

Editor:	Gordon van Gelder
Issue:	Volume 120, No. 3 & 4
ISSN:	1095-8258
Pages:	258

Charles de Lint's book review column sticks with the sorts of things he normally reviews: urban and contemporary fantasy and young adult. Predictably, I didn't find that much of interest. But I was happy to see that not all the reviews were positive, and he talked some about how a few books didn't work. I do prefer seeing a mix of positive and negative (or at least critical) reviews. James Sallis's review column focuses entirely on Henry Kuttner and C.L. Moore (by way of reviewing a collection). I'm always happy to see this sort of review. But between that and de Lint's normal subject matter, this issue of F&SF was left without any current science fiction reviews, which was disappointing. Lucius Shepard's movie review column features stunning amounts of whining, even by Shepard's standards. The topic du jour is how indie films aren't indie enough, mixed with large amounts of cane-shaking and decrying of all popular art. I find it entertaining that the F&SF film review column regularly contains exactly the sort of analysis that one expects from literary gatekeepers who are reviewing science fiction and fantasy. Perhaps David Langford should consider adding an "As We See Others" feature to Ansible cataloging the things genre fiction fans say about popular movies. "Scatter My Ashes" by Albert E. Cowdrey: The protagonist of this story is an itinerant author who has been contracted to write a family history (for $100K, which I suspect is a bit of tongue-in-cheek wish fulfillment) and has promptly tumbled into bed with his employer. But he is somewhat serious about the writing as well, and is poking around in family archives and asking relatives about past details. There is a murder (maybe) in the family history, not to mention some supernatural connections. Those familiar with Cowdrey's writing will recognize the mix of historical drama, investigation, and the supernatural. Puzzles are, of course, untangled, not without a bit of physical danger. Experienced fantasy readers will probably guess at some of the explanation long before the protagonist does. Like most Cowdrey, it's reliably entertaining, but I found it a bit thin. (6) "A Pocketful of Faces" by Paul Di Filippo: Here's a bit of science fiction, and another mystery, this time following the basic model of a police procedural. The police in this case are enforcing laws around acceptable use of "faces" in a future world where one can clone someone's appearance from their DNA and then mount it on a programmable android. As you might expect from that setup, the possibilities are lurid, occasionally disgusting, and inclined to give the police nightmares. After some scene-setting, the story kicks in with the discovery of the face of a dead woman who, at least on the surface, no one should have any motive to clone. There were a few elements of the story that were a bit too disgusting for me, but the basic mystery plot was satisfying. I thought the ending was a let-down, however. Di Filippo tries to complicate the story and, I thought, went just a little too far, leaving motives and intent more confusing than illuminating. (6) "The Paper Menagerie" by Ken Liu: Back to fantasy, this time using a small bit of magic to illustrate the emotional conflicts and difficulties of allegiance for second-generation immigrants. Jack is the son of an American farther and a Chinese mother who was a mail-order bride. He's young at the start of the story and struggling with the embarassment and humiliation that he feels at his mother's history and the difficulties he has blending in with other kids, leading to the sort of breathtaking cruelty that comes so easily from teenagers who are too self-focused and haven't yet developed adult empathy. I found this very hard to read. The magic is beautiful, personal, and very badly damaged by the cruelty in ways that can never really be fixed. It's a sharp reminder of the importance of being open-hearted, but it's also a devastating reminder that the lesson is normally learned too late. Not the story to read if you're prone to worrying about how you might have hurt other people. (6) "The Evening and the Morning" by Sheila Finch: This long novella is about a third of the issue and is, for once, straight science fiction, a somewhat rare beast in F&SF these days. It's set in the far future, among humans who are members of the Guild of Xenolinguists and among aliens called the Venatixi, and it's about an expedition back to the long-abandoned planet of Earth. I had a lot of suspension of disbelief problems with the setup here. While Earth has mostly dropped out of memory, there's a startling lack of curiosity about its current condition among the humans. Finch plays some with transportation systems and leaves humanity largely dependent on other races to explain the failure to return to Earth, but I never quite bought it. It was necessary to set up the plot, which is an exploration story with touches of first contact set on an Earth that's become alien to the characters, but it seemed remarkably artificial to me. But, putting that aside, I did get pulled into the story. Its emotional focus is one of decline and senescence, a growing sense of futility, that's halted by exploration, mystery, and analysis. The question of what's happened on Earth is inherently interesting and engaging, and the slow movement of the story provides opportunities to build up to some eerie moments. The problem, continuing a theme for this issue, is the ending. Some of the reader's questions are answered, but most of the answers are old, well-worn paths in science fiction. The emotional arc of the story is decidedly unsatisfying, at least to me. I think I see what Finch was trying to do: there's an attempted undermining of the normal conclusion of this sort of investigation to make a broader point about how to stay engaged in the world. But it lacked triumph and catharsis for me, partly because the revelations that we get are too pedestrian for the build-up they received. It's still an interesting story, but I don't think it entirely worked. (6) "Night Gauntlet" by Walter C. DeBill, Jr., et al.: The full list of authors for this story (Walter C. DeBill, Jr., Richard Gavin, Robert M. Price, W.H. Pugmire, Jeffrey Thomas, and Don Webb) provides one with the first clue that it's gone off the rails. Collaborative storytelling, where each author tries to riff off the work of the previous author while spinning the story in a different direction, is something that I think works much better orally, particularly if you can watch facial expressions while the authors try to stump each other. In written form, it's a recipe for a poorly-told story. That's indeed what we get here. The setup is typical Cthulhu mythos stuff: a strange scientist obsessed with conspiracy theories goes insane, leaving behind an office with a map of linkages between apparently unrelated places. The characters in the story also start going insane for similar reasons, leading up to a typical confrontation with things man was not meant to know, or at least pay attention to. If you like that sort of thing, you may like this story better than I did, but I thought it was shallow and predictable. (3) "Happy Ending 2.0" by James Patrick Kelly: More fantasy, this time of the time travel variety. (I call it fantasy since there's no scientific explanation for the time travel and it plays a pure fantasy role in the story.) That's about as much as I can say without giving away the plot entirely (it's rather short). I can see what Kelly was going for, and I think he was largely successful, but I'm not sure how to react to it. The story felt like it reinforced some rather uncomfortable stereotypes about romantic relationships, and the so-called happy ending struck me as the sort of situation that was going to turn very nasty and very uncomfortable about five or ten pages past where Kelly ended the story. (5) "The Second Kalandar's Tale" by Francis Marion Soty: The main question I have about this story is one that I can't answer without doing more research than I feel like doing right now: how much of this is original to Soty and how much if it is straight from Burton's translation of One Thousand and One Nights. Burton is credited for the story, so I suspect quite a lot of this is from the original. Whether one would be better off just reading the original, or if Soty's retelling adds anything substantial, are good questions that I don't have the background to answer. Taken as a stand-alone story, it's not a bad one. It's a twisting magical adventure involving a djinn, a captive woman, some rather predictable fighting over the woman, and then a subsequent adventure involving physical transformation and a magical battle reminiscent of T.H. White. (Although I have quite likely reversed the order of inspiration if as much of this is straight from Burton as I suspect.) Gender roles, however, are kind of appalling, despite the presence of a stunningly powerful princess, due to the amount of self-sacrifice expected from every woman in the story. Personally, I don't think any of the men in the story are worth anywhere near the amount of loyalty and bravery that the women show. Still, it was reasonably entertaining throughout, in exactly the way that I would expect a One Thousand and One Nights tale to be. Whether there's any point in reading it instead of the original is a question I'll leave to others. (7) "Bodyguard" by Karl Bunker: This is probably the best science fiction of the issue. The first person protagonist is an explorer living with an alien race, partly in order to flee the post-singularity world of uploaded minds and apparent stagnation that Earth has become. It's a personal story that uses his analysis of alien mindsets (and his interaction with his assigned alien bodyguard) to flesh out his own desires, emotional background, and reactions to the world. There are some neat linguistic bits here that I quite enjoyed, although I wish they'd been developed at even more length. (The alien language is more realistic than it might sound; there are some human languages that construct sentences in a vaguely similar way.) It's a sad, elegiac story, but it grew on me. (7) "Botanical Exercises for Curious Girls" by Kali Wallace: One has to count this story as science fiction as well, although for me it had a fantasy tone because the scientific world seems to play by fantasy rules from the perspective of the protagonist. Unpacking that perspective is part of the enjoyment of the story. At the start, she seems to be a disabled girl who is being cared for by a strange succession of nurses who vary by the time of day, but as the story progresses, it becomes clear that something much stranger is going on. There are moments that capture a sense of wonder, reinforced by the persistantly curious and happy narrative voice, but both are undercut by a pervasive sense of danger and dread. This is a light story written about rather dark actions. My biggest complaint with the story is that it doesn't so much end as wander off into the sunset. It set up conflict within a claustrophobic frame, so I can understand the thematic intent of breaking free of that frame, but in the process I felt like the story walked away from all of the questions and structure that it created and ended in a place that felt less alive with potential than formless and oddly pointless. I think I wanted it to stay involved and engaged with the environment it had created. (6) "Ping" by Dixon Wragg: I probably should just skip this, since despite the table of contents billing and the full title introduction, it's not a story. It's a two-line joke. But it's such a bad two-line joke that I had to complain about it. I have no idea why F&SF bothered to reprint it. (1) "The Ifs of Time" by James Stoddard: This certainly fits with the Arabian Nights story in this issue. The timekeeper of a vast and rambling castle (think Gormenghast taken to the extreme) wanders into a story-telling session in a distant part of the castle. The reader gets to listen to four (fairly good) short stories about time, knowledge, and memory, told in four very different genres. All of this does relate to why the timekeeper is there, and the frame story is resolved by the end, but the embedded stories are the best part; each of them is interesting in a different way, and none of them outlast their welcome. This was probably the strongest story of this issue. (7) Rating: 6 out of 10

According to the bureau of meteorology today is 39C. But mad dogs and Ingressmen go out in the midday sun, so I took advantage of some spare time to capture a couple of portals. After that my phone battery was apparently at 46C and my phone refused to charge. It seems that in addition to the range of hardened phone cases we need some cooling cases for phones. A case that contained a substance with a melting point of 39C wouldn t melt from body heat but would set an upper limit on the phone temperature. A peltier device probably wouldn t work as it would take too much power (and the batteries supplying the power would produce more heat). I think that the phones with an aluminium back are the best design. Aluminium is light, reflective (unlike the black plastic which is so common), and conducts heat better than most things. A phone shell made of copper probably isn t viable due to copper being dense and soft. Another problem is the need for third party cases to protect against damage. If the phone companies designed phones to be solid, rubbery at the edges (to bounce not break) and so that the screen didn t touch the surface when the phone is face down then we could avoid phone cases which also act as thermal insulation. I am a bit disappointed in Samsung. I could understand Nokia making phones that don t survive the heat well, but I don t think that Korea is that much cooler than Australia. A phone that works well on the hottest day of summer in Seoul should do better than my Galaxy S3.

Review: Perl Best Practices, by Damian Conway

Publisher:	O'Reilly
Copyright:	July 2005
Printing:	April 2011
ISBN:	0-596-00173-8
Format:	Trade paperback
Pages:	492

I had a rather bad first reaction to this book or, rather, the existence of this book. Some time ago, I started hearing about a new program named perlcritic that served as a lint program for Perl and decided to give it a try. I was taken aback by the flood of diagnostics, but even more taken aback by the fact that most of them were apparently explained only by a reference to a book that I didn't own. It struck me wrong in an open source project and gave me a negative reaction towards the book, which lingered for years. That was exacerbated by discovering that it recommended using use English in some circumstances, something that I consider to be a horrible idea. So, when a coworker recommended it and suggested I really should read it, I was dubious. I'm glad I gave it a chance, since it turns out that nearly all of my objections were based on misunderstandings or false information. (Well, except for the use English part, but more on that in a moment.) Perl Best Practices does provide a lot of advice, explaining that flood of diagnostics, but perlcritic also warns about the same thing repeatedly, inflating a handful of issues into a lot of messages. Most of the recommendations in Perl Best Practices were things I was doing already; most of the rest are entirely sensible. Also, perlcritic does come with complete explanations of its diagnostics once you know where they're hidden (the perldoc of Perl::Critic::Policy modules whose names you can get at by insisting perlcritic divulge them). And, even more delightfully, once I got past my objections, I discovered that Perl Best Practices is one of the best books on coding style that I've read. Coding style is a notoriously difficult subject, since nearly everyone is convinced their personal style is the best (or at least that they don't want to change). Conway acknowledges that up-front, and acknowledges that some things are just arbitrary and consistency with any rule set is better than following some specific rule set. He then spends surprisingly little time on the sorts of things that dominate most coding style discussions (indentation, spacing, commenting, etc.). Instead, this is primarily a book about how to write efficient and transparent Perl code, one that focuses much more on the content and structure of that code than on how it is indented. The best part is that there are no undefended rules here. Perl Best Practices contains 256 separate guidelines, some quite general ("Provide an optimal interface, rather than a minimal one") and some quite specific ("Pass constructor arguments as labeled values, using a hash reference"), but every one of them has a supporting argument and specific reasons behind it. Conway backs up every recommendation with code samples and practical scenarios showing the pluses and minuses of different approaches. This is a book unconcerned with being an authority; rather, it reads like optional advice from a good mentor, complete with insightful discussions on each point raised. You may come away from it disagreeing with Conway's specific recommendation (and I did, in several places), but you'll almost certainly be better-informed about the problem for having read it. Plus, this book is just fun to read. Admittedly, I love this sort of thing; I spend lots of time thinking about coding style in any language, and a lot more time refactoring coding style when working on my own projects to try to achieve clarity and simplicity. But even without sharing my love of the material, I think this book will be a delight for any practicing Perl programmer who hasn't yet read it. Conway clearly has a wealth of experience and years in the trenches of working with other people's Perl code. The examples he draws on are brief, comprehensible, and illuminating. He also gave me a tour of a variety of helper modules and libraries that I didn't know existed. List::Util is the most prominant example; this incredibly helpful supply of list manipulation functions that I've always half-known I wanted but never bothered to write is now part of Perl core (as of 5.7.3), so there's no reason to avoid it. You too can stop using grep when you actually mean first, or rewriting max in ad hoc ways. That does raise two of the rare flaws in this book, though. One is that I disagree (partially) with Conway's willingness to recommend non-core modules. He is a particular champion of the Readonly module over either normal file global variables or use constant, for very good reasons. But making Readonly a prerequisite for all other Perl code that one releases seems a bit annoying (speaking as someone who used to maintain local Perl installations). Maybe this isn't as big of a deal in these days of ubiquitous Linux distributions and willingness to use the CPAN shell, but I still dislike releasing code that depends on a half-dozen (or more) other CPAN modules for reasons of coding convenience and minor readability rather than core functionality. (His advocacy of Sub::Install raised similar objections.) The second flaw is not something Conway could have done anything about: this book is from 2005, and it's now 2012. Now, the Perl ecosystem is now quite mature, so that hampers the book much less than it would a corresponding book about Ruby or even Python. I also aim for compatibility with the oldest thing out there I know someone is still running, so I'm still hesitant to require anything newer than Perl 5.8. But still, this book was written seven years ago, and Perl is now at 5.14. In the meantime, we've seen core language features like given/when added, the addition of state variables, the need for substantial reworking of how Unicode I/O is handled, the addition of the new // operator, and the new package syntax, among many other things. The Perl taught here is a bit dated, and I would love to hear Conway's opinion about when (or if) to use say. Maybe someday we'll get a second edition. There are two other points that I do have to argue with. One is that Conway does advocate, in a limited way, use English. I could almost go along with his recommendation to use it only for those variables that one has to look up, except that in nearly every case there are other options and one can take the much better approach of simply not using those variables at all. But he then writes the remaining examples in the book using $EVAL_ERROR rather than $@, and I'm sorry, but no. One could not construct a more frustrating annoyance for an experienced Perl programmer than sending them on a futile hunt for where the global variable $EVAL_ERROR is defined. One can debate the merits of Larry Wall's original decision to use variables like $_, @_, $?, $!, and $?, but for better or ill this is Perl, and marginal readability gains for inexperienced programmers do not warrant confusing experienced programmers. This is particularly true when the use English variables are completely indistinguishable from normal global variables, and not infrequently look like a global variable that a programmer might choose. The second is more of an amusement that a real disagreement. Conway rightfully points out that Perl OO, and particularly the way that Perl stores object instance data, is awkward, and none of the commonly-used techniques are particularly satisfying. He then introduces a completely new way of doing instance data that, while having some advantages, has a very strange syntax and is utterly unlike how any OO code one finds in the wild is written. While the discussion of the problem that he's trying to solve is still interesting, I think the solutions he proposes will be more of a curiosity than a style that most programmers will adopt. But, those disagreements aside, I thoroughly enjoyed this book. I found it so engrossing that I kept reading it straight through a long train ride rather than switching to fiction halfway, like I do with most programming books. I've since recommended it to several other coworkers, and we're in the process of revising our internal Perl coding style based heavily on it. It's the sort of book that I expect to re-read several times to refresh my memory of Conway's analysis. If you've been avoiding this one due to misconceptions like I had, or because you think it might be too dry, or even just because you're afraid it's outdated, I strongly recommend it. If you're worried about the price of a printed (or electronic) book on this topic and you do Perl programming as part of your job, see if your employer will buy you a copy as training. It's worth it. I've been writing Perl professionally for more than fifteen years, and I learned a ton from this book. (And if it inspires you to change your coding style, take a look at perlcritic. It requires some configuration, and getting started is quite frustrating, but it reliably detects a surprisingly high percentage of the issues discussed here and can help a great deal in making the coding style shift stick until you can build new habits.) Rating: 9 out of 10

Review: Liars and Outliers, by Bruce Schneier

Publisher:	John Wiley
Copyright:	2012
ISBN:	1-118-14330-2
Format:	Hardcover
Pages:	285

One of the perils of buying a book written by a blogger one reads regularly is that the book may be little more than a rehashing of their blog, with insufficient original material to warrant the time investment. Sometimes it's still nice to support them financially, but it may not make sense to read the book. I've been following Schneier's blog for years (as should anyone with an interest in security), including through the entire process of writing Liars and Outliers, and was a bit worried that might be the case here. Thankfully, I can reassure any other worried potential readers that is not the case. This is substantial new material establishing a firm framework for thinking about incentives and controls in any society or organization. Liars and Outliers talks about security mechanisms, but it's not, at its core, a book about security. Rather, it's a book about incentives, order, and how order is established. It's a comprehensive reductionist analysis of how societies create predictability and compliance to allow us to trust other people who we have never met before and will never meet again. It's a unique (at least in my experience) combination of anthropology, sociology, security analysis, and political science. Schneier cuts across fields in an idiosyncratic but illuminating way that reminded me of (on an entirely separate topic) Jane Jacobs. This is not a prescriptive book, nor is a collection of answers, solutions, or even deep analysis of particular problems. Rather, it's an attempt to construct a general framework for analyzing societal dilemmas: conflicts between individual desires and social good, how those conflicts are resolved, and how societies can weigh the scales and influence the statistical outcomes. The closest Schneier comes to telling the reader how to solve problems is a checklist, at the end of the book, for designing effective societal pressures. Its primary contribution is vocabulary and structure. It also passes one of my litmus tests for any book about human behavior: Schneier complicates, broadens, deepens, and expands understanding, and points out complex interactions and complex feedback in effects we're inclined to consider simple, rather than simplifying or eliminating human complexity. One point I found refreshing about this book is that Schneier is scrupulous in refusing to define either society or individuals as good or bad, to the point of carefully defining terminology used in all of the social dilemmas. Following societal rules is called compliance; not following those rules is called defection. In some cases, defection is morally correct (Schneier's most frequent example is in the civil rights struggles of the 1960s in the United States). In all cases, social pressures are tools, which can be used to encourage compliance with moral or immoral systems, and which are deployed by totalitarian dictatorships and utopian communes alike. Schneier explicitly puts out of scope for this book the questions of how societal goals should be determined, how they change, and whether any given societal rule or interest is moral or immoral. He focuses, rather, only on the mechanisms, with a primary goal of informing and deepening debates over how best to encourage behavior that societies want to encourage and discourage behavior societies want to discourage. He also emphasizes discourage, as opposed to eliminate. Early on, Schneier shows some of the results of game theory, as well as basic common sense, that indicate that no healthy society can totally eliminate defection. Not only would that stifle valuable and important reform, such as changes in civil rights, but the degree of pressure required is immense. Defectors are natural and will always exist, and are sometimes valuable and necessary. Rather, the goal of a society is to reduce defectors to a level where most people can ignore their existence most of the time, a state that leads to the level of risk and trust required to have a functioning and healthy society. The word society, similarly, is intentionally broad, and can refer to just about any collection of people, from a circle of friends to a corporation, institution, or country. However, as Schneier points out early in the book, small societies rarely need much in the way of formal pressure and appear almost magically self-governing. That's the first property that he disassembles, resulting in a general classification of societal pressures into four categories: moral, reputational, institutional, and security systems. The last is an odd category that's partly orthagonal to the other three. Moral pressure is internalized conscience: the normal tendency of nearly everyone to follow their own moral code, a code that's at least partly constructed and certainly heavily influenced by the surrounding society. Reputational pressure is, in a sense, externalized morality: it's the informal reactions of others around one to one's past actions. Included in reputational pressure is shunning of every kind, from cutting off a friendship to boycotts against corporations, but it also includes confrontation from another member of one's society, the more subtle effects of our individual desires to be liked and respected, and all the various aspects of "face", honor, and respect within a community. Small communities are frequently self-governing, in Schneier's model, because they're small enough that moral and reputational pressures are sufficient and no other pressures are required. We're so used to applying moral and reputational pressure to other humans almost unconsciously that we sometimes don't even notice its existence, leading to that "magical" self-governing property. But Schneier puts pressures in a sequence: pressures that work extremely well with small groups often don't scale. Moral pressure works best with small groups and reputational pressure with somewhat larger groups, but when societies scale beyond the limits of reputational pressure when, for example, one frequently interacts with people whose reputations are unknown to you and whose subsequent opinion of you will not be relevant institutional pressure is required to force compliance. Institutional pressure is the sort of pressure that we all tend to think of first when we look for ways to enforce rules: laws, policies, contracts, and other codes of behavior that carry with them formal punishments and some enforcement mechanism. But even in societies so large that institutional pressures are frequently required, such as whole countries, moral and reputational pressures still exist and are extremely important. One of Schneier's most interesting points is his analysis of how institutional pressures can paradoxically undermine reputational and moral pressures, resulting in more defection than if the institutional pressure hadn't existed. This is just the basic framework of Schneier's analysis, hopefully giving you a feel for the structure of the book. He goes much deeper into the complicated interactions between the various levels of pressure, and then dives into an extensive look at competing societal dilemmas: cases where there is more than one society in play simultaneously, possibly demanding contradictory actions. Liars and Outliers also includes a wonderful analysis of organizational entities within the same framework, including their much-different reactions to moral, reputational, and institutional pressures. One of the most cogent analyses of the difficulties of regulating both corporations and governmental institutions falls out of that analysis, once one looks at them in light of Schneier's basic framework. Pressures quickly become complex and multi-layered, and human reactions to pressures are frequently counter-intuitive. Schneier draws extensively on game theory to show that some counter-intuitive responses are actually emergent properties of logical analysis of the situation, but that others are more uniquely human and have little or nothing to do with a mathematical cost-benefit analysis. I haven't even mentioned his discussion of security systems, and how they can extend moral, reputational, and institutional pressures, as well as add a new type of pressure (making a defecting action impossible) that scales even better than institutional pressures. Liars and Outliers has all of the supporting infrastructure you would expect in a scholarly book: notes, extensive references, and a good index. I suspect it will end up being used as at least additional reading in college classes. The notes are, unfortunately, end notes, making the full context of the book much harder to read than was necessary, but at least Schneier does separate the notes from the references so that one doesn't chase notes for further explanation and find a simple citation. As with any book like this, one always wishes it could end in a simple prescription to fix everything, but of course it doesn't. But that's also a measure of a good scholarly work. Human and organizational motivations are complex and tricky, and any framework for analyzing them needs to be able to represent that complexity. Schneier here has constructed a very powerful one, one that I started using in discussions before I'd even finished the book. Perhaps the most valuable contribution of Liars and Outliers to public discussion is clear terminology and categories, which can be of great help in finding the core components of a problem. Liars and Outliers can be slow going, particularly early on when Schneier is still defining terms and setting up the background of his analysis. One can get a bit tired of the analysis matrices of societal dilemmas. But stick with it through the groundwork, since the analyses of competing societal dilemmas and of the impact of societal pressures on organizations are exceptional. Highly recommended, particularly for anyone who is designing or implementing societal pressures: managers, political activists, or anyone in a security-related field. Rating: 8 out of 10

A few months ago, I wrote about my reverse engineering attempt to Logitech Unifying devices. Back then, I concluded my post with big hopes on the future after receiving a document with some part of the specification of the HID++ 2.0 from Logitech. A couple of weeks ago, some of my summer work has been merged to UPower, adding battery support for some Logitech devices. HID++ As I discovered late in my first reverse engineering attempt, Logitech developed a custom HID protocol named HID++. This protocol exists in two versions, 1.0 and 2.0. Some devices talk with version 1 of the protocol (like my M705 mouse) and some others talk with version 2 of the protocol (like my K750 keyboard). Recently, I've been able to be in touch with a Logitech engineer who worked on the Linux support for the Unifying receiver, and he has been really helpful and exposed me some details about this protocol. Logitech made the decision to publish their HID++ specification publicly about a year ago, but still didn't do it. The internal review needed to publish such documents hasn't be done yet. The only published draft is just an extract of the specification, with even some typo in it as I discovered. Some other documents have been recently published, but I didn't have the time to review them. They contains HID++ 1.0 specifications and some details I asked for about the K750 keyboard. UPower support It took me sometime to get a full understanding of the protocol, its different version etc. After reverse engineering my K750 keyboard, I've also reverse engineered the data stream used to get my M705 mouse battery status. I've also received some information about the HID++ 1.0 protocol, so I've been able to discover a bit more on what the packets mean. Most of my discoveries are now used to do proper #define in up-lg-unifying.c so the code makes more sense. My first patch implements a new property for UPower devices, named luminosity, that use with K750 keyboard to report the light level received. The second patch add support for Logitech Unifying devices (over USB only) and should work with at least Logitech M705 and K750 devices. This should be available with the next version of UPower, which should be 0.9.19. So far, Logitech has been kind enough to help me understanding part of the protocol and even sent me a few devices so I can play and test my work with them. Unfortunately, this will probably requires some work and time, and so far Logitech was not able to help with that. There should be enough information out there to at least add support for battery to HID++ 2.0 devices, and probably a few other things too. I hope I'd get the time do this at some point, but feel free to beat me in this race!

I am a big fan of Ruby on Rails: it does a lot of things, and it does most of them pretty well. When starting a new web project, it's the first thing I would reach for: most of the time, your problem is going to be figuring out a good product/market fit, or whipping up some internal tool without wasting a lot of programmer time. Once you've got a firm grasp of the problem, then maybe you can consider optimizing. Who cares if you do something that no one wants really really fast? However, Ruby on Rails is not beautiful in terms of being particularly fast or lightweight. No complaints from me: most of the time, I'm happy to have something that does so much for me, leaving me to work on the actual problem at hand. Once in a while, though, you do need fast and relatively lightweight, and that space has been getting more interesting over the past few years, at least in terms of the web. First of all, technologies like "Comet", utilizing web sockets or some other always-on connection are becoming more common, where a socket with the server remains open in order to quickly exchange data from the server to the client - and back. That seems to be a poor fit for something like Rails, where it can tie up a lot of resources if one isn't careful. And while computing costs continue to decline, no one minds getting more for less in terms of what their server can do. Furthermore, with frameworks like Backbone.js, pushing more and more code to the client, the server can afford to be a bit simpler and do less, so it may as well be snappy to boot. Java has long been fairly popular for "heavy lifting" types of applications, partially because it does end up being reasonably fast. But it's not something I've ever had much fun using and is usually kind of wordy, and makes you feel like you need a crew of people in Palo Alto, one in Bangalore, and one in Stockholm just to churn out all the code. And it certainly is no lightweight in terms of memory either. So... while it can certainly do pretty much anything you need, I don't see it as being the strongest player when someone needs "real time web" code, and needs it to be reasonably light weight. Ruby, outside of standard Rails stuff like Passenger, seems to offer some interesting possibilities for this kind of work, like Reel but they don't seem to have the traction other solutions do. Python is in a similar situation: the Twisted framework has been around for a while, and while it has some success stories, never seems to have really 'caught fire'. Neither of these languages was built for "concurrency" from the ground up, and that seems to have, to date, inhibited people from using them extensively for this kind of job. My gut feeling is that the need for speed and "concurrency" (or at least handling a lot of concurrent users) will drive adoption of languages heretofore not so popular on the server. Let's have a look at them. Erlang: This is by no means a new language, having been developed in Ericsson in the late 1980ies; and it implements several interesting concepts. First and foremost, concurrency is handled in the form of many small "processes", which are not actually Unix processes at all, but processes internal to the Erlang VM. The Erlang system contains a scheduler that allocates resources to all of these processes, so even if one of them dies or behaves badly, it's not a problem: the system as a whole can continue to function well. The way Erlang is built, the scheduler is preemptive: the internal "processes" don't need to yield to let other processes run. Beyond the scheduler and simple processes, Erlang gives you the tools to create elaborate trees of supervisors and workers that are quite robust to failures in any one portion of the system, as well as giving you the tools to set up a system to run on multiple, distributed computers. This kind of thinking is necessary when you write applications, such as phone switches, where downtime is really, really not ok. Erlang processes comunicate almost exclusively via message passing, meaning that state is not shared. Altogether, this makes for a fast, rock solid system that can easily handle thousands of concurrent connections without breaking a sweat. The computing world being what it is though, Erlang is likely to be more of a Lisp or Smalltalk: it's a trailblazer that did many things years before their time in other languages, but I don't see it as ever quite catching on amongst 'the masses'. It has a wonky syntax, it's a functional programming language, and because it is used in environments where too much experimentation is not good, it does not have a lot of room to break with its own past and innovate in terms of the language itself: it's slow to change and improve, even where the need to is clearly perceived. Node.js: is the opposite, in some ways: being based on Javascript, it draws on a huge number of potential programmers - orders of magnitude more than Erlang. And thanks to design decisions enforcing the use of asynchronous code and callbacks for anything that could block, it deals quite well with concurrent connections, even if the language and libraries don't really give you much in terms of "true" concurrency. This is a simple model that works pretty well, even if, theoretically, all it would take is one "while (1)" loop in a callback to block the entire system. In practice, this doesn't seem to be a big problem, though. More of a problem is writing maintainable code, when everything is a callback. Keeping the network of callbacks straight can be a bit of a chore, and is probably not an optimal model in terms of programmer productivity. That said, people seem to do make due with it, although Node is young enough that we haven't seem projects that are 5 or 6 years old and maintained by people who didn't write them. One of the advantages of being such a popular language is that lots of people have a strong interest in seeing Javascript being very, very performant. That need begat the V8 Javascript engine, from Google, which they were kind enough to release as free software. So one of the advantages that Node has is that the underlying implementation is extremely fast for a dynamic language. For many people who know Javascript, picking up Node.js is also an easy choice, even though people used to browser side programming with Javascript will have to adjust their way of thinking to succesfully tackle server projects. Go language: this is an interesting one, written by some luminaries who work at Google. It can best be described as something akin to C with some updated features, such as garbage collection, that make it more suitable for working on large projects, where things like memory leaks are going to make life very frustrating. It has the feel of a "real language, for real programmers" in that it doesn't stray far too far from what people are used to - it's not going to cause the "what the hell is this?!" reactions that Erlang might in more close-minded circles. Between the big company backing it, and the approachable syntax and concepts, Go looks like it has a good shot at the mainstream. Where it gets interesting is their concurrency model, which is apparently based on something called "communicating sequential processes" which, superficially at least, looks like it has some things in common with Erlang's "actor model" of concurrency. Under the hood, Go apparently hives off its "goroutines" to different OS level threads, but does not have a preemptive scheduler like Erlang: http://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=543 - although according to this, they may change that in the future. I'm not enough of a computer science guy to comment much on the details of CSP vs Actors, but both seem like valid models with strengths compared to trying to keep threads straight, which always seems to be a source of problems for programmers. Conclusions So, what's actually going to happen? I see Node.js as the clear front runner. It takes a worse-is-better approach that seems to work well enough as people get started. If they encounter difficulties later, they can always rewrite in something else, if needs be, but by "luring people in", Node.js has gathered a large group of users who continue, in turn, to churn out more code for use with the system, making it more attractive to new users. Programming languages are not winner-take-all markets though, so perhaps there is room for a few more languages to have decent followings in this space. Hopefully the competition will lead to ever better tools for those of us utilizing them! What do you think?

A client just lent me a new Mac Mini with OS/X Lion to play with. I think it s interesting to compare it with regular PCs running Linux. Hardware The Mac Mini is tiny. It s volume can be compared to that of a laptop. The entire outside apart from the base is made from aluminium which helps dissipate heat, it s not as effective as copper but a lot better than plastic. The ports on the system are sound input/output, 4*USB, Ethernet, Firewire, Thunderbolt (replacement for Firewire), SDXC, and HDMI. It ships with a HDMI to DVI-D adapter which is convenient if you have an older monitor (or if you have a recent monitor but no HDMI cable as I do). To open the case you unscrew the bottom, this is much like opening a watch. Also like opening a watch it s not particularly easy to screw it back on tightly, I will probably return the Mac Mini without managing to completely screw the base in. The hardware is very stylish and intricately designed, what we expect from Apple. It s also quiet. In every way it s a much better system than the workstation I m using to write this blog post. The difference of course is that this workstation was free and the Mac Mini cost just over $1000 including the RAM upgrade. A Mac Mini could be a decent Linux workstation and if I see one about to be recycled I ll be sure to grab it! Installation The Mac OS comes pre-installed so I didn t get to do a full installation. When I first booted it up it asked me if I wanted to migrate the configuration from an existing server, I don t know how well this works as I don t have a second Mac system but the concept is a good one. Maybe having full support for such a migration process would be a good release goal for a Linux distribution. After determining that the installation is a fresh one I was asked for a mac.com email address or other form of registration. I skipped this step as I don t have such an email address, but it could be useful. Red Hat has Kickstart to allow configuration of an OS install based on a file from a server (via NFS or HTTP). Debian supports preseeding to take OS configuration options from a file at install time [1] and the same option can be used for later stages of OS autoconfiguration. One thing that would be really useful is to allow the user to enter a URL for configuration data for an individual account or for all accounts, so someone with an account on one workstation could upload the configuration (which would be either encrypted or sanitised to not have secret data) and then download it when first logging in to a new system. I can easily take a tar archive of my home directory to a new system, but people like my parents don t have the skill to do that. One of the final stages of system configuration was to identify the keyboard. The system asked me to press the key to the right of the left shift key and then the key to the left of the right shift key and then offered me three choices of keyboard. That was an interesting way of reducing the list of possible keyboards offered to the user and thus preventing the user from selecting one that is grossly incorrect. Cloud Storage When first logging in I was asked for an iCloud [2] login. iCloud doesn t seem like a service that should be trusted, it s based in the US and has been designed to facilitate access by government agencies. Ubuntu One [3] is a similar service that is run by a more reputable organisation, but the data is still stored by Amazon (a US corporation) which seems like a security risk. Ubuntu One isn t in Debian (which is strange as Ubuntu is based on Debian) so it was too much effort for me to determine whether it encrypts data in a way that protects the users against US surveillance. The cost of Ubuntu One storage is $4 per month with music streaming. A better option is to use a self-hosted OwnCloud installation for a private or semi-private cloud [4]. A cheap server from someone like Hetzner (E49 per month for 3TB of RAID-1 storage) [5] is a good option for OwnCloud hosting. A cheap Hetzner server is about $US64 per month (at current conversion rates) which is equivalent to about 16 users of Ubuntu One for music streaming. So if 20 people shared a Hetzner server they could save money when compared to Ubuntu One while also getting a lot more storage. I ve got about 300G of unused disk space on the Hetzner server that hosts my blog and when the system is migrated to a newer Hetzner server with 3TB disks it will have 2.5TB of unused space, I could store a lot of cloud data in that! The main features of iCloud and Ubuntu One seem to be distribution of random data files (anything you wish), streaming music to various playing systems, and copying pictures from phones as soon as they are taken. These are all great features but it s a pity that they don t appear to support distributed document storage. Apple Pages apparently allows documents to be immediately saved to the cloud. I d like to be able to save a file with Libre Office at home and then access it from my netbook using the cloud, of course that would require encryption for secret files but that s not so hard to do. One advantage with such distributed storage is that when combined with offline-IMAP for email it would almost entirely remove the need for backups of the desktop systems I maintain for my relatives. I could have all their pictures and documents go to the cloud and all their email stay on the server so if their desktop PC dies I could just give them a new PC and get it all back from the cloud! OwnCloud supports replication, so if I got two servers I would be covered against a server failure. But I think that for a small server with less than a dozen users it s probably better to just take some down-time when things go wrong and do regular backups to an array of cheap SATA disks. App Store Apple has an App Store in the OS. The use of such a store on a desktop OS is a new thing for me. It s basically the same as the Android Market (Google Play) but on the desktop. I think that there is a real scope for an organisation such as Canonical to provide such a market service for Linux. I think that there is a lot of potential for apps to be sold for less than $10 to a reasonable number of Linux users. A small payment would be inconvenient for the seller if they have to interact with the customer in any way and also inconvenient for the buyer if they are entering all their credit card details into a web site for the sale. But for repeat sales with one company being an intermediary it would be convenient for everyone. A market program for a desktop Linux system could provide a friendly interface to selecting free apps from repositories (for Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, or other distributions) and also have the same interface used for selecting paid applications. Conclusion This isn t much of a review of Apple OS/X or the Mac Mini. Thinking about ways of implementing the best features of Lion on Linux is a lot more interesting. I admire Apple in the same way that I admire sharks, they are really good at what they do but they don t care about my best interests any more than a hungry shark cares about me. Update I got the currency conversion wrong in the first version of this article. It seems that to save money via a shared Hetzner server instead of Ubuntu One about 20 users would be needed instead of 10. But that s still not too many and would still give a lot more storage. It would be a little more difficult to arrange though, probably anyone who is seriously into computers knows 10 people who would want to share such a service (including people like their parents who want things to just work and don t understand what s happening). But getting 20 people would be more difficult.

• [1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Preseed
• [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icloud
• [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_One
• [4] https://owncloud.com/
• [5] http://www.hetzner.de/en/hosting/produktmatrix/rootserver-produktmatrix-ex

Related posts:

1. Xen and SE Linux EWeek review of RHEL5 The online magazine EWeek has done a review of RHEL5....
2. Servers vs Phones Hetzner have recently updated their offerings to include servers with...
3. Modern Laptops Suck One of the reasons why I m moving from a laptop...

On Wednesday, February 1, a new virtual server May First/People Link recently rented went offline. We contracted the virtual server through Server4All because we need their un-metered 100Mbit connection to help us handle the bandwidth for Sahara Reporters, one of the most important independent news sources for Saharan Africa. With the server offline, the web site was down as well. We scrambled to setup alternative caching servers to handle the bandwidth. When I logged into our control panel, I saw the message: This virtual server has been suspended by the administrator. Please contact support. I immediately contacted support and then received the message:

Hello
We have received the following complaint associated with your server/service.
IP: 76.73.121.164
To prevent any further abuse we have suspended this service. In order to
resume, we request you to cooperate with our investigation as promptly as
possible. Please respond to us with the following details:
(1) What has caused the complaint
(2) What is the server used for. Purpose?
(3) How can you resolve the complaint and make sure it will not be repeated.
Depending on the nature of the complaint and your response, we will put back
the server online.  Please note, this has violated our Terms Of Service. We
expect your response within 24 hours, otherwise your account will be
terminated permanently.  Thank you

What?? What complaint?? I followed up but had to wait til the next day to get the response.

Here is the full log,
An email advertizing the Domain Name: saharareporters.com
has been sent to the blacklist.woody.ch spamtrap.
This Domain does resolve to IP addresses one of which your are responsible:
76.73.121.164
Please investigate why this Domain has been advertized.
Attached you find the headers and reports in ARF for automatic processing.
Feedback is appreciated.
Actual listing periods:
Bounce: 1 Hour in DNS.
Whitelisted IP: Not lised in DNS.
Spam: 24 hours in DNS.
Every Hit: 14 days in evidence DB.
For any questions or Feedback, contact abuse@woody.ch
From: is intentionally set to a bit-bucket.
Kind regards
-Benoit Panizzon-

There is no attachment. I went to woody.ch and it was in German. Then tried blacklist.woody.ch, but no luck. Finally I found the Woody's World Blacklist Page. I plugged in our IP address into their checker and I got:

Output from the Check, if empty the IP is not listed.
164.121.73.76.[name of the blacklist] being tested.
Host 164.121.73.76.blacklist.woody.ch not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Host 164.121.73.76.blacklist.woody.ch not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Host 164.121.73.76.rbl.maps.vix.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Host 164.121.73.76.rbl.maps.vix.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Host 164.121.73.76.relays.mail-abuse.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Host 164.121.73.76.relays.mail-abuse.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
Host 164.121.73.76.relays.ordb.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Host 164.121.73.76.relays.ordb.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Host 164.121.73.76.dev.null.dk not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Host 164.121.73.76.dev.null.dk not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Host 164.121.73.76.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Host 164.121.73.76.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Host 164.121.73.76.bl.spamcop.net not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Host 164.121.73.76.bl.spamcop.net not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Host 164.121.73.76.relays.visi.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Host 164.121.73.76.relays.visi.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
164.121.73.76.blacklist.spambag.org has address 208.91.197.182
164.121.73.76.blacklist.spambag.org descriptive text "v=spf1 -all"

So, Woody's World thinks we are listed in spambag.org. I went to spambag.org and learned that the domain is for sale. I then tried blacklist.spambag.org and got the same page. This page has many links all pointing to advertisements. The "RBL List" link takes me to a page advertising "5 foods you must not eat." Next, out of curiousity, I tried Mxtoolbox. I got one hit from Barricuda. Barricuda says the reputation of the IP address is "poor". Why? According to Barricuda, the reasons could be:

• Your email server contains a virus and has been sending out spam.
• Your email server may be improperly configured.
• Your PC may be infected with a virus or botnet software program.
• Someone in your organization may have an infected PC with a virus or botnet program.
• You may be using a dynamic IP address which was previously used by a known spammer.
• Your marketing department may be sending out bulk emails that do not comply with the CAN-SPAM Act.
• You may have an insecure wireless network which is allowing unknown users to use your network to send spam.
• In some rare cases, your recipient's Barracuda Spam Firewall may be improperly configured.

Keep in mind, this IP address is not used for sending email. It's just the web site. I then took a step back and re-read the complaint and noticed that it says that the domain name saharareporters.com was listed in a spam email. Hm. More concerted searching for the terms "woody spamtrap blacklist" and I found a pattern in URLs that suggested I plug in the following: http://news.scoutnet.org/rblhostlist.php?id=saharareporters.com.uri And sure enough, there was a result. In short, it was a classic Nigerian Oil scam in which the person claims to be "JAMES IBORI ex-governor of DELTA STATE oil city." The scammer acknowledges that he has been arrested, but promises lots of cash to the person who can help him. In an effort to boost their credibility, the scammer included a link to a Sahara Reporters article about the real James Ibori. And that, my friends, is enough to have one of the most prominent independent African news organization taken offline. But, Sahara Reporters shouldn't necessarily feel singled out. Sahara Reporters should feel singled out. They exist to illuminate news from Africa. They were taken offline because a series of individuals don't know the difference between a prominent independent African news service and a criminal scammer. To most of the Internet, Nigeria and email scams are synonymous. That has to change. Although Sahara Reporters is particularly vulnerable, any site hosted with Server4All can potentially be taken down. All you have to do is write a fake spam/scam email, including a link to the web site you want to be taken offline, and then send that email to: listme@blacklist.woody.ch. I'm currently following up with both Woody's World and Server4All. However, once this particular issue is resolved, we're left with a much bigger and ominous problem. If your hosting provider (or their upstream provider) takes your site offline when it receives a complaint first and then asks questions second, you have a big problem. All of our legal fights over our rights to keep content online are moot if our providers, without any legal pressure to do so, still take down our services based on spurious complaints.

Review: Effective Java, Second Edition, by Joshua Bloch

Publisher:	Addison-Wesley
Copyright:	2008
Printing:	October 2009
ISBN:	0-321-35668-3
Format:	Trade paperback
Pages:	319

Guy Steele, in the forward to this book, writes:

Programs, unlike spoken sentences and unlike most books and magazines, are likely to be changed over time. It's typically not enough to produce code that operates effectively and is readily understood by other persons; one must also organize the code so that it is easy to modify. There may be ten ways to write code for some task T. Of those ten ways, seven will be awkward, inefficient, or puzzling. Of the other three, which is most likely to be similar to the code needed for the task T in next year's software release?

Teaching this, as well as how to avoid being awkward, inefficient, or puzzling, is the goal of this book. Clearly communicating effective, idiomatic, and maintainable usage to a newcomer to a programming language is one of the hardest types of programming books to write. Books like this are therefore quite scarce. Most introductory texts do try to communicate some degree of basic usage, but they rarely go far beyond the syntax, and when they do that usage is rarely both well-defended and inobvious. Bloch takes the concept quite far indeed, going deep not only into the Java language but also into object-oriented software construction in general. Effective Java is modeled after Effective C++ by Scott Meyers, a book I've not read (due to the lack of need for C++ in my programming life), but which I've heard a great deal about. This means the book is organized into 78 numbered items, each of which provides specific advice and analysis about one area of Java. Examples include item 16, "Favor composition over inheritance," or item 33, "Use EnumMap instead of ordinal indexing." As you can see, they run the gamut from high-level design principles to specific coding techniques. This sort of book demands a lot of the author. Everyone has a coding style, and everyone can make usage recommendations, but the merits or lack thereof of specific recommendations are often only visible with substantial later experience. More than any other type of programming language book, this sort of usage guide must be written by a language expert with years of experience with both good and bad code in the language. This is where Effective Java shines. Joshua Bloch led the design and implementation of significant portions of the Java core libraries at Sun and is currently the chief Java architect at Google, but even without knowing that background, his expertise is obvious. Every item in this book is backed up with specific examples and justification, and Bloch quotes extensively from the Java core library to illustrate both the advantages of the techniques he describes and the problems that result when they're not followed. This is not an introductory book, which is one of the things that makes it so efficient and concise. It's a book aimed at the intermediate or advanced Java programmer and assumes you already know the language and the basic pitfalls. There are only a few items in here that would be obvious to most experienced programmers, and even there Bloch ties them back to specific issues in Java in ways that are illuminating. I would not have expected to learn something new from a chapter on a hoary old problem like avoiding float and double for precise values, but I did: Bloch discusses the available alternatives within Java and their tradeoffs and then makes useful specific recommendations. If, like me, you're an experienced programmer already but relatively new to Java, you still should not read this book first. You need a general introduction to the language and libraries and a few projects under your belt before you can appreciate it. (I personally started with Thinking in Java by Bruce Eckel and it served me well, although on several points of style Bloch disagrees with advice in Eckel's book, and I find Bloch's arguments convincing.) But I think this is one of the best possible choices for your second book on Java, in large part because Bloch will head off bad design and style decisions that you don't realize you're making and catch them before they become entrenched. I'm glad I read it as soon as I knew the language well enough to absorb it, and it's the sort of book that I'm likely to re-read sections of whenever I work on Java code related to those topics. It's not entirely obvious that you should take my advice about this sort of book, since I'm not a Java expert and don't have those years of experience with it. But I've checked the recommendation with other programmers I know who are experts, and I've never heard anything but praise for it. It's also one of the books recommended in Coders at Work, and Bloch is one of the people interviewed there, which carries a lot of weight with me. And, apart from that, any long-time programmer who cares about their craft builds an internal sense of aesthetics around what a well-written program should look like and finds themselves recognizing a similar sense in other people's code, even in languages with which they're not familiar. Bloch's recommendations and analysis feel right; one can immediately see how they improve maintainability and robustness, and some of the techniques he shows are elegant and beautiful. This is not a general programming book. It's specifically focused on the Java language, and much of it deals with specific suggestions on how to use Java's core libraries and language features. If you're not going to be writing code in Java, I can't really recommend it. But one of the things I loved about it is that, while talking about Java, Bloch also talks about object-oriented software construction: techniques for extending foreign libraries one does not control, API design, and the proper use of inheritance, among other topics.. That advice is some of the best object-oriented software design advice I've ever read. There isn't enough of it to recommend the book to people with no interest in Java, but this book has even made my C and Perl code better, and has helped me grasp the tradeoff between inheritance and composition in a deeper way than I ever had before. It's a lovely side bonus. If you're writing Java, read this book. If you're learning Java, don't read it first, but read it second, and more than once, or alongside a project where you can apply the advice. It's dense and efficient in the information that it conveys, which means there's more in a couple pages here than in thirty or forty pages of some of the sprawling introductory programming books. I did read it cover to cover, which is one of the better ways to get a sense of Bloch's more general advice on software construction, but you'll hit information overload and will want to return to it piecemeal to fully absorb it. And do get the second edition. I'm sure the first edition is available cheap used, but the additions of enums and generics to the Java language are hugely important and provide some of the most elegant and graceful techniques in the book. Rating: 9 out of 10

Good morning all! It feels like forever since I last blogged . Which is extremely bad of me *slaps own wrist*. However, I m been horrendously stupidly busy. As some of you may know, I m very much an Android fan. Recently, I ve gotten myself a shiny Galaxy SII. Given the fact that alongside my day job of being a Web Developer for an Online Retailer, I m also a Voluntary Ambulance Person I thought it d be useful to ask my current workplace if they d provide me a mobile phone cover for my new phone. Of course, work were more than happy to provide me with a shiny Samsung Galaxy S2 case (I actually went for the Case-Mate Barely There in brushed aluminium). Being a voluntary Ambulance Person, I regularly have to go to random places to pick up an ambulance/attend an event. Because of that I rely quite heavily on Google Maps and it s navigation features (Free Sat Nav in my opinion, the killer feature of Android). Having only had my phone a week, I started to find that there were a few problems with the GPS. Whereas previously, I d been able to lock on almost instantly, It d now take me about half an hour (literally) to get a lock on anything. I tried Googling, I tried everything I could think of, but to no avail. I downloaded GPS Test, and it was showing that while it was picking up a couple of sattelites, it wasn t picking up enough to get a decent lock The image above is a screenshot of the GPS test from directly outside my front door, taken after it had settled down. As you can imagine, I wasn t happy and was ready to send the phone back. Then, for some reason, a brainwave hit me (It doesn t happen often). What changed from when it was working to now? I know! The Case *takes case off, tries GPS test again* It can be amazing what happens when you realise that shiny case you have is mainly made of aluminium. Guess what works well at deflecting radio signals and the like You got it, aluminium. So now I need to decide whether to get another case or whether to just take the case off when I need to do sensible things. Other than the case problem, I m finding that the Samsung Galaxy SII is a great phone (as soon as I got rid of Touchwiz). I m not a fan of the OEM Samsung crap that s been bolted onto the phone, and will, as soon as there s a decent release, be putting a copy of CyanogenMod on the phone (I ve already made most of the tweaks I just want rid of SNS) In other news I ve started more and more gaming again. If you re interested in a couple of rounds of TF2 or some SC2 (or some Portal 2 Co-Op) then give me a shout with your Steam ID / Battle.net ID and I ll see what I can do. I m thinking of starting doing some Let s Play Videos, as my Youtube Channel is looking a bit sparse! I m going to try and start blogging a bit more aswell so if there s anything you want to see me blog about pop a post in the comments below! Till next time..